ADMISSIONS CONSULTING

Admissions Consulting

Our admissions consulting service specialize in helping clients with their applications to top schools, which offer strong value proposition and significant ROI for the individual client and/or their sponsoring company and country.
The application process for top schools are far more complex and competitive than that of non top schools. We are the ONLY education consulting firm in Indonesia that have the expertise and experience to provide admissions consulting help to Indonesian applicants for the top schools.

Learn more about what our admissions consulting service covers.

United States

Europe

School
Acceptance Rate
GPA GMAT TOEFL IELTS Demographic
# LoR(s) Required
Avg Mid 80% Avg Mid 80% Code Score Code Score Class Size International Females
Stanford GSB 6% 3.75   733 570-800* L9R-KW-09 100 4704 7 407 40% 40% 2
Harvard HBS 11% 3.67   730 690-760 HRLX892 109 3444 7.5 942 35% 43% 2
Berkeley Haas 13% 3.66 3.4 - 3.9 715 680-760 N2VPT47 100 4833 (02) 7 246 40% 41% 2
MIT Sloan 15% 3.60   716 670-760 X5X-QS-41 NR 3536 NR 402 38% 41% 2
Columbia CBS 18% 3.50 3.1 - 3.8 715 680-760 QF8-N6-36 100 2174 (02) 7 762 42% 36% 2
Wharton 20% 3.60 3.1 - 3.9 732 700-770 G56-97-73 100 2926 (02) NA 861 32% 43% 2
NYU Stern 20% 3.51 3.2 - 3.8 720 680-760 5TF-HW-35 100 2582 7 405 38% 35% 2
Kellogg 21% 3.60 3.2 - 3.9 724 690-760 6WZ-3J-89 100 1546 7 492 40% 43% 2
Booth 24% 3.60 3.2 - 3.9 726 570-780* H9X-9F-34 104 1832-02 7 585 36% 42% 2
Yale 21% 3.63 3.3 - 3.9 720 690-760 3TJ-BX-45 NR 3327 NR 326 36% 40% 2
UCLA Anderson 20% 3.48 3.2 - 3.8 716 680-760 2NZ-2F-24 100 4837 7 360 39% 32% 2
LBS 15%     701 600-780* Z11-J7-50 105 0898 7.5 417 92% 37% 2
Tuck 23% 3.50   717 680-760 Z04-NH-64   3351   286 32% 42% 2
INSEAD 24%   3.4 - 3.6 700 650-740 DL3-S8-89 105 0970 7.5 509 90% 30% 2
Virginia Darden 28% 3.50 3.0 - 3.8 706 600-780* KC7-0X-86   5820(02)   334 38% 35% 2
Michigan Ross 28% 3.40 3.0 - 3.8 708 660-760 SN1-J6-77 100 1839 NA 407 35% 32% 1
Duke Fuqua 23% 3.40 3.0 - 3.8 690 640-750 Q13-N5-32   5156   445 40% 35% 2
Cambridge Judge 32%   Min. 3.3 690   WF1-T3-68 110   7.5 160 91% 37% 1
Oxford Said 32% 3.50   690 Min. 650 Q0G-4B-59 110 0807 7.5 340 95% 31% 2
Cornell Johnson 30% 3.37 2.8 - 3.7 700 550-760* 5JW-BM-96 100 2098 7 274 35% 26% 2
IMD 27%         SKR-MM-13 NA   NA 90 90% 30% 3
Texas McCombs 30% 3.40 2.9 - 3.8 694 640-740 396-44-45   6882   265 28% 32% 1
USC Marshall 29% 3.30 3.0 - 3.7 690 620-730 389-9C-23   4852   223 26% 30% 1
CMU Tepper 31% 3.30 2.8 - 3.6 690 640-740 69H-XH-99   2074(02)   208 35% 26% 1
Washington Olin 30% 3.40 2.6 - 4.0 696 570-770* RFT-WG-61   6929   141 35% 40% NR
UNC Kenan-Flager 39% 3.40 2.8 - 3.8 710 640-750 D40-HL-07   5816   276 32% 30% 2
Rice Jones 27% 3.30 2.9 - 3.8 676 640-710 3WS-WD-92 100 7320 7 116 23% 35% 1
Emory Goizueta 30% 3.40 2.9 - 3.9 678 620-740 C3Q-71-17 100 5187 (02) 7 166 35% 34% 2
Georgetown MSB 43% 3.34 2.9 - 3.8 691 640-730 JT7-G0-20 100 5224(02) 7.5 270 41% 32% 1
Indiana Kelley 29% 3.36 2.9 - 3.7 668 600-730 8ZG-41-37 100 1324(02) 7 186 36% 29% 1
HEC 17%     690 640-740 0TL-6C-28 100 0649 7 206 90% 33% 2
IESE 23%     680 550-770 S21-BK-12 105 0755 7.5 350 80% 28% 2
IE 25%     670 600-770 6XT-ZH-98 100 0707 7 354 91% 31% 2
ESADE 46%         93M-3K-60 100 0884 7.5 167 95% 31% 2
RSM Erasmus           QK8-CX-30 NR   NR 106 96% 37% 2
SDA Bocconi           3WJ-L8-42 100 0698 7 98 83% 30% 2
Vanderbilt Owen 42% 3.40 3.3 - 3.5 691 616-720   100 1871 7 177 29% 32% 2

Mobile User : Scroll/swipe left & right to view entire table

* Represents the full range as supposed to the mid 80% range
NR = Not Required
NA = Not Accepted
LoR = Letter of Recommendation

Share: